Dynamic connection for LINQ to SQL DataContext

If for some reason you need to specify a specific connection string for a DataContext, you can of course pass the connection string when you initialise you DataContext object.  A common scenario could be a dev/test/stage/live connection string, but in my case its for either a live or archive database.

 

I however want the connection string to be handled by the DataContext, there are probably lots of different reasons someone would want to do this…but here are mine.

  • I want the same connection string for all instances of DataContext, but I don’t know what it is yet!
  • I prefer the clean code and ease of not using a constructor parameter.
  • The refactoring of using a constructor parameter could be a nightmare.

 

So my approach is to create a new partial class for the DataContext and handle empty constructor in there.

First from within the LINQ to SQL designer I changed the connection property to None.  This will remove the empty constructor code from the auto generated designer.cs file.

image

Right click on the .dbml file, click View Code and a file and class is created for you!

image

You’ll see the new class created in solutions explorer and the file will open.

We are going to be playing with constructors so you need to add the inheritance from System.Data.Linq.DataContext

  1. public partial class DataClasses1DataContext : System.Data.Linq.DataContext
  2.    {
  3.    }

 

Add the empty constructor and I have added a property that will get my connection string, you will have whatever logic you need to decide and get the connection string you require.  In my case I will be hitting a database, but I have omitted that code.

  1. public partial class DataClasses1DataContext : System.Data.Linq.DataContext
  2. {
  3.    // Connection String Keys - stored in web.config
  4.    static string LiveConnectionStringKey = "LiveConnectionString";
  5.    static string ArchiveConnectionStringKey = "ArchiveConnectionString";
  6.  
  7.    protected static string ConnectionString
  8.    {
  9.       get
  10.       {
  11.          if (DoIWantToUseTheLiveConnection) {
  12.             return global::System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings[LiveConnectionStringKey].ConnectionString;
  13.          }
  14.          else {
  15.             return global::System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings[ArchiveConnectionStringKey].ConnectionString;
  16.          }
  17.       }
  18.    }
  19.  
  20.    public DataClasses1DataContext() :
  21.       base(ConnectionString, mappingSource)
  22.    {
  23.       OnCreated();
  24.    }
  25. }

 

Now when I new up my DataContext, I can just leave the constructor empty and my partial class will decide which one i need to use.

Nice, clean code that can be easily refractored and tested.

 

Share this post :
  • Share This Post:
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Technorati

Print | posted on Friday, April 16, 2010 1:14 AM

Feedback

# re: Dynamic connection for LINQ to SQL DataContext

Left by Tim Hoolihan at 4/21/2010 3:36 AM
Gravatar This helps centralize the config of your connection, but if you keep going down that path, you'll have bits of config spackled around the code. And Ultimately, you still have to write DoIWantToUseTheLiveConnection, which may or may not support future scenarios, like a third connection string.

In essence, what I'm saying is that your going halfway to dependency injection. Why not just go all the way and centralize all of that type of constructor config logic in one place?

# re: Dynamic connection for LINQ to SQL DataContext

Left by Steve Clements at 5/20/2010 10:21 AM
Gravatar That's a fair point and I don't have an answer. I guess this served the purpose i needed it for.

Your comment:





 
 

Copyright © Steve Clements

Design by Bartosz Brzezinski

Design by Phil Haack Based On A Design By Bartosz Brzezinski